| Official Beastmen | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Cassius
Posts : 3 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2010-04-25
| Subject: Official Beastmen Sun 25 Apr 2010 - 19:00 | |
| Hi, wich is the official beastmen list? The old one or the one on TC29? The only change between the lists is the Trample rule? Thanks | |
|
| |
REminenz Champion
Posts : 47 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2010-03-20 Location : Vienna, Austria
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Dwarfs Achievements earned: none
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Sun 25 Apr 2010 - 19:06 | |
| Have a look here. All warbands rated 1a are "official". Hence the list from TC29 (or the Empire in Flames supplement) is the "official" one. | |
|
| |
Myntokk Venerable Ancient
Posts : 679 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-09-03 Age : 38 Location : California
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Possessed Achievements earned: none
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Sun 25 Apr 2010 - 19:25 | |
| - Cassius wrote:
- Hi,
wich is the official beastmen list? The old one or the one on TC29? The only change between the lists is the Trample rule? Thanks The old one (from TC 7 or 9, can't remember which) was supposed to be replaced by the new one (Empire in Flames/TC 29), I believe, so that is the official one. However, there were some pretty big differences between the two. For starters, the new one brought beastmen in line with the current Warhammer version of them (i.e. no 2 wounds on every Gor, faster but lower LD), and also added the Centigor who didn't exist back in 5th edition which is what the first list was based on. A lot of the skills were refined, as well. Any which way, both are (in my experience) fairly balanced lists, so if you or someone in your group had a preference for one over the others, I don't see a big problem with it. | |
|
| |
Cassius
Posts : 3 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2010-04-25
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Sun 25 Apr 2010 - 19:30 | |
| I'm sorry, with "old one" I means the EIF list, not the TC7. The EIF list and the TC29 list are different, in the EIF there isn't the Trample rule. On the 2005 Rules Review is written "Beastmen warbands from Empire In Flames". So is the TC29 warband unofficial? | |
|
| |
Myntokk Venerable Ancient
Posts : 679 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-09-03 Age : 38 Location : California
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Possessed Achievements earned: none
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Sun 25 Apr 2010 - 19:47 | |
| - Cassius wrote:
- I'm sorry, with "old one" I means the EIF list, not the TC7.
The EIF list and the TC29 list are different, in the EIF there isn't the Trample rule. On the 2005 Rules Review is written "Beastmen warbands from Empire In Flames". So is the TC29 warband unofficial? My bad, I thought the EiF and TC 29 lists were identical. What's the "trample" rule? Now that I think of it, I believe one list changed "Shaggy Hide" from wielding a two-handed weapon in one hand to +1 armor save. I'm pretty sure whichever one has the +1 armor save version of the skill is the official list. | |
|
| |
Cassius
Posts : 3 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2010-04-25
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Sun 25 Apr 2010 - 19:54 | |
| Is the additional attack made with hooves by Centigors. I've found it, it'also in the EINF book, but under the henchmen list, problably they made a mistake with layout! | |
|
| |
cianty Honour Guard
Posts : 5287 Trading Reputation : 5 Join date : 2007-09-27 Location : Berlin
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Monks (BTB) Achievements earned: Silver Tom
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Sun 25 Apr 2010 - 20:36 | |
| The TC version was pubslihed before the EIF supplement was released (it was a kind of preview). The official one is the EIF version plus all the errata from the Mordheim Errata. | |
|
| |
pascal the rascal Ancient
Posts : 445 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 58 Location : Gent, Belgium, Europe
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Achievements earned: none
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Sat 22 May 2010 - 16:48 | |
| Wow ! just wanted to check on centigor for a beastmen warband that I hopefully will start before I grow old and senile, since it wasn't on the list I have, but now you guys have got my head spinning ! Nobody happens to have the last edition list with errata already included / corrected ? (yeah, yeah, I know, I'm a lazy bum ... but on the other hand ; I need all my time to paint !) | |
|
| |
cianty Honour Guard
Posts : 5287 Trading Reputation : 5 Join date : 2007-09-27 Location : Berlin
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Monks (BTB) Achievements earned: Silver Tom
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Sat 22 May 2010 - 17:18 | |
| - pascal the rascal wrote:
- Nobody happens to have the last edition list with errata already included / corrected ?
Such a file simply does not exist. At least not from GW. You'd have to do it yourself. | |
|
| |
Da Bank Rules Guru
Posts : 1927 Trading Reputation : 3 Join date : 2008-01-26
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Marienburgers Achievements earned: None
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Sat 22 May 2010 - 17:20 | |
| Cianty is correct. There was no energy put into fixing the documents. If I had PDF writer it would be tempting to do. | |
|
| |
pascal the rascal Ancient
Posts : 445 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 58 Location : Gent, Belgium, Europe
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Achievements earned: none
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Sat 22 May 2010 - 18:06 | |
| eh ... Bank ... i just googled ; apparently there are free converters pd to word and back again ... have i got you tempted yet ? a little bit ... ? | |
|
| |
Pathfinder Dubstyles Venerable Ancient
Posts : 778 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2008-04-11 Age : 40 Location : North Carolina, US
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Possessed Achievements earned: None
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen Mon 24 May 2010 - 2:54 | |
| The Mordheimer has a good FAQ section, although one must be careful because some are really old, and refer to rules which have been changed in the Rules ReviewFor example; one answer says it is possible to attack with a spear and sword in combat. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Official Beastmen | |
| |
|
| |
| Official Beastmen | |
|