DRD1812 Warlord
Posts : 229 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-01-28 Location : Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA
| Subject: Multiple Attacks vs. Multiple Enemies Fri 30 Jan 2009 - 8:25 | |
| Page 18 of the living rule book states the following:
"If a warrior is touching more than one enemy, he can choose which to attack. If he has more than 1 attack, he can divide them in any way the player wishes, so long as he makes this clear before rolling to hit."
There's a problem of interpretation here. Does this statement mean that 1) You must declare all attack targets before rolling any to hits, or 2) You can make attacks one at a time, declaring your target before each to hit roll? | |
|
Eliazar Etheral
Posts : 1987 Trading Reputation : 1 Join date : 2007-08-28 Age : 36 Location : Lund, Sweden
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Pirates (Unofficial) Achievements earned: none
| Subject: Re: Multiple Attacks vs. Multiple Enemies Fri 30 Jan 2009 - 9:00 | |
| As far as I know, you must declare whom you will be attacking with which number of attacks before any to-hit rolls are made.
So, you can't attack one model until it's dead and then use you remaining attacks for another. | |
|
JAFisher44 General
Posts : 183 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-01-16 Age : 47 Location : Elma, WA, USA
Personal Info Primary Warband played: Dwarfs Achievements earned: none
| Subject: Re: Multiple Attacks vs. Multiple Enemies Fri 30 Jan 2009 - 9:30 | |
| Eliazar is correct. You declare targets for all attacks, then roll all attacks. | |
|
DRD1812 Warlord
Posts : 229 Trading Reputation : 0 Join date : 2009-01-28 Location : Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA
| Subject: Re: Multiple Attacks vs. Multiple Enemies Fri 30 Jan 2009 - 16:22 | |
| That is as I thought. Good to have confirmation. | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Multiple Attacks vs. Multiple Enemies | |
| |
|