RationalLemming
Venerable Ancient
Posts: 691
Trading Reputation: 0
Join date: 2008-11-05
Age: 27
Location: Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
Personal Info
Primary Warband played:  Ostlanders
Achievements earned: none
 |  Subject: BTB - Restless Dead Scarecrow  Mon 4 Apr 2011 - 11:36 | |
| Hi, Should the 'Construct' special rule be for the serious injury chart or the injury chart during the battle? | Quote: | | Construct: The scarecrow is an undead construct and may re-roll any rolls on the injury table except for wounds caused by fire. |
Thanks,
Ben
|
|
Ordo Septenarius
Warlord
Posts: 203
Trading Reputation: 0
Join date: 2010-10-06
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Personal Info
Primary Warband played:  Possessed
Achievements earned: none
| | Subject: Re: BTB - Restless Dead Scarecrow Mon 4 Apr 2011 - 16:28 | |
| I believe it's for the injury chart.
My larger question is - do you have to take the second result?
|
|
cianty
Honour Guard
Posts: 4984
Trading Reputation: 4
Join date: 2007-09-27
Location: Berlin
Personal Info
Primary Warband played:  Monks (BTB)
Achievements earned:  Silver Tom
| | Subject: Re: BTB - Restless Dead Scarecrow Mon 4 Apr 2011 - 19:01 | |
| It is the (normal) injury table indeed. Otherwise it would say "serious" injury chart. It's not our fault GW named these so similar.  Ordo, you always have to accept the second result when re-rolling a roll. _________________  |
|
RationalLemming
Venerable Ancient
Posts: 691
Trading Reputation: 0
Join date: 2008-11-05
Age: 27
Location: Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
Personal Info
Primary Warband played: Ostlanders
Achievements earned: none
| | Subject: Re: BTB - Restless Dead Scarecrow Mon 4 Apr 2011 - 21:28 | |
| Thanks.  That's the way we have been playing it. It just struck us as fairly unique (not a bad thing) which prompted me to ask. |
|
